ArticleActa neurochirurgica2024
Tailored surgical approaches for spinal chordomas: A multidisciplinary perspective.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidisciplinary En-Bloc Resection of Sacral Chordoma: A Narrative Review and Illustrative Case.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The role of multidisciplinary team meetings in the management of spinal tumors.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe treatment of spinal chordomas presents a significant challenge due to their resistance to both radiotherapy and chemotherapy as well as the complexity of the surgical procedures required. This study presents a series of cases of primary spinal chordomas, focusing on the development of a personalized therapeutic strategy that is tailored to each patient's unique clinical status. This approach aims to ensure that treatments are optimally aligned with the patient's overall prognosis and surgical eligibility.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 14 patients with primary spinal chordomas treated at our institution. We evaluated surgical strategies, clinical outcomes, and survival rates, The therapeutic strategy was formulated after interdisciplinary conferences with sarcoma management specialists. Data were collected on patient demographics, surgical details, postoperative outcomes, and follow-up status.
resultsAll patients presented with neurological deficits preoperatively, which generally improved post-surgery. The study included a detailed analysis of two distinct surgical approaches: five patients underwent en bloc resection with dorsal stabilization and nine received decompression only. Patients undergoing en bloc resection showed a reduced need for additional surgery due to the comprehensive removal of the tumor. As anticipated, 40% of the patients who underwent decompression experienced tumor progression within the first three months. However, given the poor overall prognosis, the objective of maintaining neurological function was achieved.
conclusionsSurgical en bloc resection offers a viable and effective intervention for spinal chordomas, enhancing neurological function. It is imperative to tailor treatment strategies to individual prognoses, integrating insights from multidisciplinary discussions that meticulously evaluate surgical risks. This collaborative approach aids in selecting the most appropriate surgical technique tailored to each patient's specific condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.