Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39361109›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2024

Postoperative rectovaginal fistula: stoma may not be necessary-a French retrospective cohort.

Maëlig Poitevin, Jean-Francois Hamel, Marie Ngoma, Charlène Brochard, Emilie Duchalais, Laurent Siproudhis, Jean-Luc Faucheron, Vincent de Parades, Arnaud Alves, Eddy Cotte and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Maëlig PoitevinDepartment of Medicine, University of Health, Angers, France.
Jean-Francois HamelDepartment of Visceral Surgery, CHU Angers (Angers University Hospital), University of Angers, 9, Angers, Cedex, France.
Marie NgomaInstitut Léopold Bellan, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Service de Proctologie Médico-Chirurgicale, Paris, France.
Charlène BrochardUnité D'explorations Fonctionnelles Digestives, CHU Rennes Pontchaillou, Rennes, France.
Emilie DuchalaisDepartment of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.
Laurent SiproudhisUnité D'explorations Fonctionnelles Digestives, CHU Rennes Pontchaillou, Rennes, France.
Jean-Luc FaucheronUMR 5525, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, CHU Grenoble Alpes, TIMC, VetAgro Sup, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Vincent de ParadesInstitut Léopold Bellan, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Service de Proctologie Médico-Chirurgicale, Paris, France.
Arnaud AlvesDepartment of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Caen, Caen Cedex, France.
Eddy CotteDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Lyon Sud, CHU Lyon, Cedex, France.
Mehdi OuaissiDepartment of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Chambray Les Tours, France.
Valérie BridouxDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Lisa CorbièreDepartment of Digestive Surgery, CHU Rennes Pontchaillou, Rennes, France.
Pablo Ortega-DeballonDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Fawaz Abo-AlhassanDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Bertrand TrillingUMR 5525, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, CHU Grenoble Alpes, TIMC, VetAgro Sup, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Aurélien VenaraDepartment of Medicine, University of Health, Angers, France. auvenara@chu-angers.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative rectovaginal fistula leads to a loss of patients' quality of life and presents significant challenges to the surgeon. The literature focusing specifically on postoperative rectovaginal fistulas is limited. The objective of the present study is to identify factors that can enhance the success of the management of this postoperative rectovaginal fistula.

methodsThis retrospective multicentric study included all patients undergoing surgery for rectovaginal fistulas, excluding those for whom the etiology of rectovaginal fistula was not postoperative. The major outcome measure was the success of the procedure.

resultsA total of 82 patients with postsurgical fistulas were identified, of whom 70 were successfully treated, giving a success rate of 85.4%. On average, these patients required 3.04 ± 2.72 interventions. The creation of a diversion stoma did not increase the success rate of management [odds ratio (OR) = 0.488; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.107-2.220]. Among the 217 procedures performed, 69 were successful, accounting for a 31.8% success rate. The number of interventions and the creation of a diversion stoma did not correlate with the success of management. However, direct coloanal anastomosis was significantly associated with success (OR = 35.06; 95% CI 1.271-997.603; p = 0.036) as compared with endorectal advancement flap (ERAF). Other procedures such as Martius flap did not show a significantly higher success rate.

conclusionThe creation of a diversion stoma is not necessary in closing a fistula. ERAF should be considered as a first-line treatment prior to proposing more invasive approach such as direct coloanal anastomosis.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsRectovaginal FistulaSurgical StomasAdultAgedAnastomosis, SurgicalFemaleFranceHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeIatrogenicPostoperativeRectovaginal fistulaStomaSurgery

Identifiers

PMID39361109
PMCPMC11450074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.