Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39361026›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

An in vitro approach reveals molecular mechanisms underlying endocrine disruptor-induced epimutagenesis.

Jake D Lehle, Yu-Huey Lin, Amanda Gomez, Laura Chavez, John R McCarrey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jake D LehleDepartment of Neuroscience, Developmental and Regenerative Biology, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0833-7068
Yu-Huey LinDepartment of Neuroscience, Developmental and Regenerative Biology, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1321-0680
Amanda GomezDepartment of Neuroscience, Developmental and Regenerative Biology, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States.
Laura ChavezDepartment of Neuroscience, Developmental and Regenerative Biology, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States.
John R McCarreyDepartment of Neuroscience, Developmental and Regenerative Biology, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5784-9318

Funding

TISSUE CULTURE---COREP30CA054174 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Lei Zheng · 1991 to 2026
$59.1M
UTSA RISE Research Training ProgramR25GM060655 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI BAREA-RODRIGUEZ, EDWIN J · 2000 to 2022
$21.6M
Mechanism Underlying the Transduction of Epimutations from the Soma to the Male GermlineP50HD098593 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI ZHOU, TONG · 2019 to 2024
$7.2M
Illumina NovaSeq 6000 Sequencing SystemS10OD030311 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI LAI, ZHAO · 2021 to 2021
$600k
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development P50 HD98593NCI NIH HHS P30 CA054174NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD098593NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA054179NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM060655NIH HHS S10 OD030311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) such as bisphenol S (BPS) are xenobiotic compounds that can disrupt endocrine signaling due to steric similarities to endogenous hormones. EDCs have been shown to induce disruptions in normal epigenetic programming (epimutations) and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that predispose disease states. Most interestingly, the prevalence of epimutations following exposure to many EDCs persists over multiple generations. Many studies have described direct and prolonged effects of EDC exposure in animal models, but many questions remain about molecular mechanisms by which EDC-induced epimutations are introduced or subsequently propagated, whether there are cell type-specific susceptibilities to the same EDC, and whether this correlates with differential expression of relevant hormone receptors. We exposed cultured pluripotent (iPS), somatic (Sertoli and granulosa), and primordial germ cell-like (PGCLC) cells to BPS and found that differential incidences of BPS-induced epimutations and DEGs correlated with differential expression of relevant hormone receptors inducing epimutations near relevant hormone response elements in somatic and pluripotent, but not germ cell types. Most interestingly, we found that when iPS cells were exposed to BPS and then induced to differentiate into PGCLCs, the prevalence of epimutations and DEGs was largely retained, however, >90% of the specific epimutations and DEGs were replaced by novel epimutations and DEGs. These results suggest a unique mechanism by which an EDC-induced epimutated state may be propagated transgenerationally.

Indexed as

Endocrine DisruptorsPhenolsAnimalsBisphenol S CompoundsEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleMaleMiceMutationSulfonesbisphenol SBisphenol S CompoundsEndocrine DisruptorsPhenolsSulfonesDNA methylationendocrine disrupting chemicalsepigenetic reprogrammingepigeneticsgeneticsgenomicsmousetransgenerational epigenetic inheritance

Identifiers

PMID39361026
PMCPMC11449486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.