Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39360976›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

Learning to explain is a good biomedical few-shot learner.

Peng Chen, Jian Wang, Ling Luo, Hongfei Lin, Zhihao Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peng ChenSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0975-236X
Jian WangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Ling LuoSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5141-0259
Hongfei LinSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Zhihao YangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6186-2024

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62302076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationSignificant progress has been achieved in biomedical text mining using deep learning methods, which rely heavily on large amounts of high-quality data annotated by human experts. However, the reality is that obtaining high-quality annotated data is extremely challenging due to data scarcity (e.g. rare or new diseases), data privacy and security concerns, and the high cost of data annotation. Additionally, nearly all researches focus on predicting labels without providing corresponding explanations. Therefore, in this paper, we investigate a more realistic scenario, biomedical few-shot learning, and explore the impact of interpretability on biomedical few-shot learning.

resultsWe present LetEx-Learning to explain-a novel multi-task generative approach that leverages reasoning explanations from large language models (LLMs) to enhance the inductive reasoning ability of few-shot learning. Our approach includes (1) collecting high-quality explanations by devising a suite of complete workflow based on LLMs through CoT prompting and self-training strategies, (2) converting various biomedical NLP tasks into a text-to-text generation task in a unified manner, where collected explanations serve as additional supervision between text-label pairs by multi-task training. Experiments are conducted on three few-shot settings across six biomedical benchmark datasets. The results show that learning to explain improves the performances of diverse biomedical NLP tasks in low-resource scenario, outperforming strong baseline models significantly by up to 6.41%. Notably, the proposed method makes the 220M LetEx perform superior reasoning explanation ability against LLMs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our source code and data are available at https://github.com/cpmss521/LetEx.

Indexed as

Data MiningNatural Language ProcessingComputational BiologyDeep LearningHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID39360976
PMCPMC11483110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.