Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39360905›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2024

ROMI: a randomized two-stage basket trial design to optimize doses for multiple indications.

Shuqi Wang, Peter F Thall, Kentaro Takeda, Ying Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shuqi WangDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0285-8778
Peter F ThallDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Kentaro TakedaAstellas Pharma Global Development Inc., Northbrook, IL 60062, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8584-0521
Ying YuanDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3163-480X

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Tropism Enhanced Oncolytic Adenovirus for the Treatment of Brain TumorsP50CA127001 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Juan Fueyo · 2008 to 2026
$41.2M
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center SPORE in Ovarian CancerP50CA281701 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ROBERT C BAST, ANIL K SOOD · 2023 to 2026
$11.5M
Project 3: Inhibiting Oxidative Phosphorylation in Pancreatic CancerP50CA221707 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KOPETZ, SCOTT, MAITRA, ANIRBAN · 2019 to 2023
$11.0M
Bayesian Methods for Complex Precision Biotherapy Trials in OncologyR01CA261978 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LIN, RUITAO, THALL, PETER F · 2021 to 2024
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA127001NCI NIH HHS P50 CA221707NCI NIH HHS P50 CA281701NCI NIH HHS R01 CA261978NIH HHS 1R01CA261978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimizing doses for multiple indications is challenging. The pooled approach of finding a single optimal biological dose (OBD) for all indications ignores that dose-response or dose-toxicity curves may differ between indications, resulting in varying OBDs. Conversely, indication-specific dose optimization often requires a large sample size. To address this challenge, we propose a Randomized two-stage basket trial design that Optimizes doses in Multiple Indications (ROMI). In stage 1, for each indication, response and toxicity are evaluated for a high dose, which may be a previously obtained maximum tolerated dose, with a rule that stops accrual to indications where the high dose is unsafe or ineffective. Indications not terminated proceed to stage 2, where patients are randomized between the high dose and a specified lower dose. A latent-cluster Bayesian hierarchical model is employed to borrow information between indications, while considering the potential heterogeneity of OBD across indications. Indication-specific utilities are used to quantify response-toxicity trade-offs. At the end of stage 2, for each indication with at least one acceptable dose, the dose with highest posterior mean utility is selected as optimal. Two versions of ROMI are presented, one using only stage 2 data for dose optimization and the other optimizing doses using data from both stages. Simulations show that both versions have desirable operating characteristics compared to designs that either ignore indications or optimize dose independently for each indication.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremDose-Response Relationship, DrugMaximum Tolerated DoseRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiometryComputer SimulationHumansModels, StatisticalResearch DesignSample SizeBayesian hierarchical modeldose optimizationmultiple indicationsProject Optimusrandomizationutility

Identifiers

PMID39360905
PMCPMC11447723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.