Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39360595›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2025

Widening the Price Gap: The Effect of The Netherlands' 2020 Tax Increase on Tobacco Prices.

Cloé Geboers, Math J J M Candel, Corné van Walbeek, Gera E Nagelhout, Hein de Vries, Bas van den Putte, Geoffrey T Fong, Marc C Willemsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cloé GeboersDepartment of Health Promotion (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1075-6234
Math J J M CandelDepartment of Methodology and Statistics (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Corné van WalbeekResearch Unit on the Economics of Excisable Products, School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa.
Gera E NagelhoutDepartment of Health Promotion (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hein de VriesDepartment of Health Promotion (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Bas van den PutteDepartment of Communication (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Geoffrey T FongDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Marc C WillemsenDepartment of Health Promotion (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

Canadian Institutes for Health ResearchDiabetes Funds FDN-148477Dutch Cancer SocietyNetherlands Heart FoundationOntario Institute for Cancer Research and the Canadian Cancer SocietyThe Lung Foundation NetherlandsThrombosis Foundation #2.1.19.004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe public health impact of a tobacco tax increase depends on the extent to which the industry passes the increase onto consumers, also known as tax-pass through. In 2020, the Netherlands announced tax increases aimed at increasing the retail price by €1 per 20 factory-made (FM) cigarettes and €2.50 per 50 g of roll-your-own (RYO) tobacco. This study examines the pass-through rate after the tax increase, and whether this differed by type of tobacco and brand segment. AIMS AND

methodsSelf-reported prices of 117 tobacco brand varieties (cigarettes = 72, RYO = 45) pre- and post-tax increases were extracted from the 2020 International Tobacco Control Netherlands Surveys (n = 2959 respondents). We calculated the tax pass-through rate per variant, examining differences between the type of tobacco and brand segments.

resultsOn average, cigarette prices increased by €1.12 (SD = 0.49; 112% of €1) and RYO prices by €2.53 (SD = 0.60; 101% of €2.50). Evidence of differential shifting across segments was found, with evidence of overshifting in non-discount varieties. The average price of discount varieties increased by €0.20 less than non-discount varieties. Similarly, the net-of-tax price decreased in discount varieties (cigarettes = -€0.02; RYO = -€0.05), but increased in non-discount varieties (cigarettes = +€0.14; RYO = +€0.20).

conclusionsDespite the large tax increase, the industry increased prices in line with or above the required level. Through differential shifting, the price gap between discount and non-discount varieties has widened, which may reduce the public health impact of the tax increase. Measures aimed at reducing price variability should be strengthened in taxation policy, such as the European Tobacco Tax Directive (TTD). IMPLICATIONS: We found that the industry used differential shifting after a significant tobacco tax increase in the Netherlands. Prices increased more than required in higher-priced products, but not in lower-priced products. This pattern was found both for FM cigarettes and RYO tobacco. Through differential shifting, the industry undermines the potential public health impact of tobacco tax increases, by offering a relatively cheaper alternative, which discourages people to quit or reduce consumption. The revision of the European TTD provides an opportunity to address the widening price gap-both between and within product segments-across the European Union.

Indexed as

CommerceTaxesTobacco IndustryTobacco ProductsAdultFemaleHumansMaleNetherlands

Identifiers

PMID39360595
PMCPMC11931203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.