Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39360382›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2024

A scaling relationship between thermodynamic and hydrodynamic interactions in protein solutions.

Jonathan S Kingsbury, Charles G Starr, Yatin R Gokarn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonathan S KingsburyGlobal CMC Development, Sanofi, Framingham, Massachusetts. Electronic address: jonathan.kingsbury@sanofi.com.
Charles G StarrGlobal CMC Development, Sanofi, Framingham, Massachusetts.
Yatin R GokarnGlobal CMC Development, Sanofi, Framingham, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weak protein interactions are associated with a broad array of biological functions and are often implicated in molecular dysfunction accompanying human disease. In addition, these interactions are a critical determinant in the effective manufacturing, stability, and administration of biotherapeutic proteins. Despite their prominence, much remains unknown about how molecular attributes influence the hydrodynamic and thermodynamic contributions to the overall interaction mechanism. To systematically probe these contributions, we have evaluated self-interaction in a diverse set of proteins that demonstrate a broad range of behaviors from attractive to repulsive. Analysis of the composite trending in the data provides a convenient interconversion among interaction parameters measured from the concentration dependence of the molecular weight, diffusion coefficient, and sedimentation coefficient, as well as insight into the relationship between thermodynamic and hydrodynamic interactions. We find relatively good agreement between our data and a model for interacting hard spheres in the range of weak self-association. In addition, we propose an empirically derived, general scaling relationship applicable across a broad range of self-association and repulsive behaviors.

Indexed as

HydrodynamicsProteinsSolutionsThermodynamicsDiffusionProtein BindingProteinsSolutions

Identifiers

PMID39360382
PMCPMC11617628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.