SynthesisAlpha psychiatry2024
Anxiety and Depression after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.
Synthesis in Alpha psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A scoping review of virtual reality technology utilization in patients with colorectal cancer.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Effects of digital health interventions on anxiety, depression, and quality of life in colorectal cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Depression and anxiety symptoms and their association with quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer: A cross-sectional study.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2026Article
- Effects of home-based exercise on anxiety, depression, cancer-related fatigue, and quality of life in colorectal cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Trajectories and interactions of body image and subjective well-being in colorectal cancer patients with colostomy: a longitudinal study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Anxiety and depression commonly afflict colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery patients, but their impact on survival remains uncertain. Methods: We systematically reviewed three databases for relevant articles. Data included study and patient characteristics, cancer type, anxiety/depression measures, timing, and prevalence. Meta-analyses, using common- or random-effects models, assessed associations. Subgroup analyses based on follow-up duration and publication bias assessment were performed. Results: We analyzed seven cohort studies, examining anxiety and depression's impact on mortality in colorectal cancer patients. Samples ranged from 215 to 567 for anxiety and 215 to 46 710 for depression. Using common- or random-effects models based on heterogeneity, anxiety and depression showed increased mortality risk. Pooled odds ratio (OR) for anxiety was 1.07 (95% CI [confidence interval] 1.05-1.10), depression's OR was 2.76 (95% CI 1.25-6.11; random-effects). Pooled hazard ratio (HR) for anxiety was 1.33 (95% CI 1.28-1.37; common-effects) and 1.30 (95% CI 1.19-1.43; random-effects). HRs for depression were 1.45 (95% CI 1.30-1.61; random-effects) and 1.28 (95% CI 1.25-1.32; common-effects). Subgroup analyses revealed stronger effects on mortality in a shorter follow-up (0-5 years) compared to a longer follow-up (5-28 years). Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows that anxiety and depression are linked to increased mortality in patients with CRC. The findings suggested that screening and treating mental distress improve survival and quality of life in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.