Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39360296›Full record

ArticleAlpha psychiatry2024

Validity, Reliability, and Factor Structure of the Suicide Crisis Scale in Turkish.

Fikret Ferzan Ergün, Özlem Kazan Kızılkurt, Medine Yazıcı, Hüseyin Güleç

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alpha psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fikret Ferzan ErgünDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Health Sciences Erenköy Training and Research Hospital for Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8280-2979
Özlem Kazan KızılkurtPrivate Clinic, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7121-9139
Medine YazıcıDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Health Sciences Erenköy Training and Research Hospital for Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-7279-0916
Hüseyin GüleçDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Health Sciences Erenköy Training and Research Hospital for Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9227-9373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: In our study, we aimed to adapt the Suicide Crisis Inventory (SCI), which can be used specifically to assess the acute phase of suicide, to the Turkish population by examining its Turkish validity and reliability in a non-clinical sample. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a total of 300 university students aged 18-24 years were evaluated online using the Socio-demographic and Clinical Data Form, the SCI, and the Suicide Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ). Criterion validity, discriminative validity, and factor analyses (exploratory and confirmatory) were conducted for the validity of the SCI, and internal consistency and item-total correlations were examined for reliability analyses. Additionally, a linear regression model was constructed to assess the predictive validity of the SCI. The predictive validity of past SCI scores was evaluated using a simple regression model. Results: When the linear regression model was tested with SCI scores as the independent variable and SBQ scores as the dependent variable [ Conclusion: We believe that the SCI will be a useful tool in assessing short-term suicide risk in a Turkish sample and in conducting scientific research. The SCI was found to be sufficient for use in a Turkish sample for the evaluation of short-term suicide risk, considering some limitations.

Indexed as

Reliabilitysuicidesuicide crisissuicide riskvalidity

Identifiers

PMID39360296
PMCPMC11443287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.