Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39360246›Full record

ArticleJournal of plankton research

Dietary plasticity in small Arctic copepods as revealed with prey metabarcoding.

Snorre Flo, Camilla Svensen, Kim Præbel, Bodil Annikki Bluhm, Anna Vader

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of plankton research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Snorre FloDepartment of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Framstredet 39, 9019 Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0208-2620
Camilla SvensenDepartment of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Framstredet 39, 9019 Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9577-3935
Kim PræbelDepartment of Forestry and Wildlife Management, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, PO Box 400 Vestad, 2418 Elverum, Norway.
Bodil Annikki BluhmDepartment of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Framstredet 39, 9019 Tromsø, Norway.
Anna VaderDepartment of Arctic Biology, The University Centre in Svalbard, PO Box 156, N-9171 Longyearbyen, Svalbard, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Small copepods (<2 mm) compose an important constituent of the Arctic marine food web, but their trophic interactions remain largely unexplored, partly due to methodological limitations. Methods: We here characterize the prey of the abundant cyclopoid Key findings: Chaetognaths were unexpectedly the most consistently identified taxa and composed 47% of all prey reads. Some taxa were seasonally important, including diatoms in April-May (43%), dinoflagellates in December (15%) and March (17%), and urochordates in August (20%). Compositional differences among species were also discernible, and the Conclusions: Our results thus indicate that dietary plasticity is common in small Arctic copepods, regardless of their behaviors or strategies for finding sustenance. We further hypothesize that such plasticity is an important adaptation in systems where prey availability is highly seasonal.

Indexed as

ArcticDNA metabarcodingpredatorpreysmall copepodstrophic interactions

Identifiers

PMID39360246
PMCPMC11443965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.