Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39360206›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2024

Comparison of Modified ROX Index Score and ROX Index Score for Early Prediction of High Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy Outcome in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

Arin G Sarkar, Ankur Sharma, Nikhil Kothari, Shilpa Goyal, Tanvi Meshram, Kamlesh Kumari, Sadik Mohammed, Pradeep Bhatia

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Arin G SarkarDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8553-8532
Ankur SharmaDepartment of Trauma & Emergency (Anesthesiology and Critical Care), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9339-6988
Nikhil KothariDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9829-905X
Shilpa GoyalDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8983-0953
Tanvi MeshramDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4625-6357
Kamlesh KumariDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9877-4095
Sadik MohammedDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0518-8551
Pradeep BhatiaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5082-7151

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We compared the modified ROX index and ROX index scores in earlier predictions of high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy outcomes in patients with acute respiratory failure. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study on 151 acute respiratory failure patients initiated on HFNO therapy. The primary objective of this research was to compare the modified ROX index and ROX index to investigate which score predicted HFNO treatment outcome earlier. Results: The modified ROX index score had better predictive power than the ROX score at different time points, especially one hour following the start of HFNO therapy (AUC 0.790; 95% CI: 0.717-0.863; Conclusion: The modified ROX index is a better predictor of the success of HFNO therapy than the ROX index. Furthermore, the presence of any comorbidities did not affect modified ROX index cut-off values or the outcome of HFNO therapy. How to cite this article: Sarkar AG, Sharma A, Kothari N, Goyal S, Meshram T, Kumari K,

Indexed as

Acute hypoxemic respiratory failureHigh flow nasal oxygenHypoxiaIntensive careNon-invasive ventilation

Identifiers

PMID39360206
PMCPMC11443257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.