Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39360190›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences

Sequencing vs. amplification for the estimation of allele dosages in sugarcane (

Hugo Jaimes, Alejandra Londoño, Carolina Saavedra-Diaz, Jhon Henry Trujillo-Montenegro, Jershon López-Gerena, John J Riascos, Fernando S Aguilar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hugo JaimesColombian Sugarcane Research Center Cenicaña Calle 38N 3CN-75 Cali Valle del Cauca Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-9453-7372
Alejandra LondoñoColombian Sugarcane Research Center Cenicaña Calle 38N 3CN-75 Cali Valle del Cauca Colombia.ORCID 0009-0006-1627-3224
Carolina Saavedra-DiazColombian Sugarcane Research Center Cenicaña Calle 38N 3CN-75 Cali Valle del Cauca Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-4681-5235
Jhon Henry Trujillo-MontenegroColombian Sugarcane Research Center Cenicaña Calle 38N 3CN-75 Cali Valle del Cauca Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-9336-584X
Jershon López-GerenaColombian Sugarcane Research Center Cenicaña Calle 38N 3CN-75 Cali Valle del Cauca Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-1899-0965
John J RiascosColombian Sugarcane Research Center Cenicaña Calle 38N 3CN-75 Cali Valle del Cauca Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-1864-968X
Fernando S AguilarColombian Sugarcane Research Center Cenicaña Calle 38N 3CN-75 Cali Valle del Cauca Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-9833-2681

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Premise: Detecting single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a cost-effective way is fundamental in any plant breeding pipeline. Here, we compare three genotyping techniques for their ability to reproduce the allele dosage of SNPs of interest in sugarcane ( Methods: To identify a reproducible technique to estimate allele dosage for the validation of SNP markers, the correlation between Flex-Seq, kompetitive allele-specific PCR (KASP), and genotyping-by-sequencing and restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (GBS+RADseq) was determined for a set of 76 SNPs. To find alternative methodologies for allele dosage estimation, the KASP and Flex-Seq techniques were compared for the same set of SNPs. For the three techniques, a population of 53 genotypes from the diverse sugarcane panel of the Centro de Investigación de la Caña de Azúcar (Cenicaña), Colombia, was selected. Results: The average Pearson correlation coefficients between GBS+RADseq and Flex-Seq, GBS+RADseq and KASP, and Flex-Seq and KASP were 0.62 ± 0.27, 0.38 ± 0.27, and 0.38 ± 0.30, respectively. Discussion: Flex-Seq reproduced the allele dosages determined using GBS+RADseq with good levels of precision because of its depth of sequencing and ability to target specific positions in the genome. Additionally, Flex-Seq outperformed KASP by allowing the conversion of a higher number of SNPs and a more accurate estimation of the allele dosage. Flex-Seq has therefore become the genotyping methodology of choice for marker validation at Cenicaña.

Indexed as

Flex‐Seqgenotyping‐by‐sequencing (GBS)kompetitive allele‐specific PCR (KASP)restriction site–associated DNA sequencing (RADseq)sugarcane

Identifiers

PMID39360190
PMCPMC11443436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.