Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39360154›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Education2024

Education Research: Educating Child Neurology Residents About Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures: A Needs Assessment.

Afsaneh Talai, Daniel A Freedman, Dara V F Albert, Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Top Articles That Are ChangingNeurology. Education · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Afsaneh TalaiFrom the Division of Pediatric Neurology (A.T.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas and Children's Medical Center of Dallas; Department of Neurology (D.A.F.), Dell Medical School, Austin, TX; and Division of Child Neurology (D.V.F.A.), Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6478-325X
Daniel A FreedmanFrom the Division of Pediatric Neurology (A.T.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas and Children's Medical Center of Dallas; Department of Neurology (D.A.F.), Dell Medical School, Austin, TX; and Division of Child Neurology (D.V.F.A.), Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1340-0233
Dara V F AlbertFrom the Division of Pediatric Neurology (A.T.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas and Children's Medical Center of Dallas; Department of Neurology (D.A.F.), Dell Medical School, Austin, TX; and Division of Child Neurology (D.V.F.A.), Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3867-2297
Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are difficult to differentiate from epileptic seizures (ES) even for neurologists who see these conditions frequently. This difficulty is due to overlapping semiologic findings between the 2 diagnoses. Previous studies have shown that trainees, including neurology trainees, are not accurate in differentiating PNES from ES. Neurologists often find the communication of PNES difficult. Despite these challenges, most programs do not have formal curricula for teaching PNES, and there are no standards for residency curricula in this topic. The aim of this study was to understand the gaps in resident education on PNES. Methods: This study was accomplished through a needs assessment of current pediatric neurology residents and residency program directors (PDs). Two unique surveys were distributed, 1 for child neurology trainees and 1 for PDs. Questions were designed to understand trainees' self-reported knowledge, confidence, current education received, and desired teaching. Similarly for PDs, questions were designed to assess the state of education on PNES at their programs, sufficiency of education, and their desire for standardized curriculum. Results: Sixty-eight trainees and 21 PDs responded to the survey. Approximately one-quarter of trainees reported neutral to low levels of confidence and 38% reported neutral to low levels of knowledge in caring for patients with PNES. Trainees reported that directing patients with PNES to appropriate management was the most challenging aspect of care, followed by communicating the diagnosis, with 60% and 46% reporting difficulty, respectively. Only 21% of residents felt their current PNES education needs no improvement. One-fifth of PDs felt their current PNES education is not sufficient, and all reported they would incorporate a standardized curriculum. Trainees reported preferring to learn about this topic through lectures and simulation, while PDs preferred online modules and simulation. Discussion: While residents and PDs report high confidence and knowledge in treating pediatric patients with PNES, respondents felt improvement is needed to their curricula regarding this topic. Multiple learning methods are preferred, with emphasis on communicating the diagnosis and management of patients once the diagnosis has been made. PDs desire a standardized curriculum and would incorporate one into their programs. Findings of this study could be used to create a national curriculum.

Identifiers

PMID39360154
PMCPMC11441745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.