Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39360138›Full record

Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2024

Downskin Surface Roughness Prediction with Machine Learning for As-Built CM247LC Fabricated Via Powder Bed Fusion with a Laser Beam.

Jageon Koo, Seungjae Lee, Adrian Matias Chung Baek, Eunju Park, Namhun Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jageon KooDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, South Korea.
Seungjae LeeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, South Korea.
Adrian Matias Chung BaekDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, South Korea.
Eunju ParkDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, South Korea.
Namhun KimDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4429-2191

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Powder bed fusion with a laser beam (PBF-LB) is a widely used metal additive manufacturing method for fabricating complex three-dimensional components with a variety of metallic powders. However, metal parts fabricated by PBF-LB often present surface quality problems because of the layer-wise building process and the occurrence of partially unmelted powder particles. To reduce the surface roughness, surface post-processing is required, which incurs additional time and cost. In particular, the downskin surface generally has the worst surface roughness among the fabricated components. The rough surface reduces the lifetime and quality of the holed part owing to cracks, corrosion, and wear. In this study, for fast and efficient improvement of the downskin surface roughness of CM247LC fabricated by PBF-LB, machine learning algorithms, namely support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), and multilayer perceptron (MLP), were introduced to predict downskin surface roughness in the process parameter selection step. Three PBF-LB process parameters (laser power, scanning speed, and hatching distance) and the overhang angle were selected as the input variables for the machine learning models for predicting downskin surface roughness. Test samples were prepared and used for training and evaluation of the proposed machine learning algorithms, with RF showing the most promising results. Early results were confirmed when model predictions were compared to the actual measured roughness of a fabricated vane part, with average deviations of 13.7%, 4.3%, and 22.5% observed for SVR, RF, and MLP, respectively. The results showed that the proposed machine learning models could accurately predict the downskin surface roughness in the process parameter selection step without the use of any sensor, with RF showing the highest prediction accuracy.

Indexed as

downskin surface roughnessmachine learningpowder bed fusion with a laser beampredictive model

Identifiers

PMID39360138
PMCPMC11443140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.