Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2024
AI-Based Knowledge Extraction from the Bioprinting Literature for Identifying Technology Trends.
Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Synergy of Artificial Intelligence and 3D Bioprinting: Unlocking New Frontiers in Precision and Tissue Fabrication.Advanced functional materials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioprinting is a rapidly evolving field, as represented by the exponential growth of articles and reviews published each year on the topic. As the number of publications increases, there is a need for an automatic tool that can help researchers do more comprehensive literature analysis, standardize the nomenclature, and so accelerate the development of novel manufacturing techniques and materials for the field. In this context, we propose an automatic keyword annotation model, based on Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, that can be used to find insights in the bioprinting scientific literature. The approach is based on two main data sources, the abstracts and related author keywords, which are used to train a composite model based on (i) an embeddings part (using the FastText algorithm), which generates word vectors for an input keyword, and (ii) a classifier part (using the Support Vector Machine algorithm), to label the keyword based on its word vector into a manufacturing technique, employed material, or application of the bioprinted product. The composite model was trained and optimized based on a two-stage optimization procedure to yield the best classification performance. The annotated author keywords were then reprojected on the abstract collection to both generate a lexicon of the bioprinting field and extract relevant information, like technology trends and the relationship between manufacturing-material-application. The proposed approach can serve as a basis for more complex NLP-related analysis toward the automated analysis of the bioprinting literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.