Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2024
Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Accurate Prediction of Temperature and Melt Pool Dimension in Metal Additive Manufacturing.
Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced Numerical Modeling of Powder Bed Fusion: From Physics-Based Simulations to AI-Augmented Digital Twins.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Physics-Informed Online Learning for Temperature Prediction in Metal AM.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The temperature distribution and melt pool size have a great influence on the microstructure and mechanical behavior of metal additive manufacturing process. The numerical method can give relatively accurate results but is time-consuming and, therefore, unsuitable for in-process prediction. Owing to its remarkable capabilities, machine learning methods have been applied to predict melt pool size and temperature distribution. However, the success of traditional data-driven machine learning methods is highly dependent on the amount and quality of the training data, which is not always convenient to access. This article proposes a physics-informed machine learning (PIML) method, which integrates data and physics laws in the training parts, overcoming the problems of low speed and data availability. An artificial neural network constrained by the heat transfer equation and a small amount of labeled data is developed to predict the melt pool size and temperature distribution. Besides, the locally adaptive activation function is utilized to improve the prediction performance. The result shows that the developed PIML model can accurately predict the temperature and melt pool dimension under different scanning speeds with a small amount of labeled data, which shows significant potential in practical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.