Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39360065›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Utilizing Multifaceted Approaches to Target Drug Delivery in the Brain: From Nanoparticles to Biological Therapies.

Sameenkhan Anwarkhan, Jebastin Koilpillai, Damodharan Narayanasamy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sameenkhan AnwarkhanDepartment of Pharmacy, Sri Ramaswamy Memorial (SRM) Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, IND.
Jebastin KoilpillaiDepartment of Pharmacy, Sri Ramaswamy Memorial (SRM) Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, IND.
Damodharan NarayanasamyDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Sri Ramaswamy Memorial (SRM) Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) poses an important obstacle to treating neurological disorders because it limits the entry of therapeutic agents into the central nervous system (CNS). Surmounting this barrier is crucial for delivering drugs effectively and targeting precise areas of the brain affected by conditions like Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, and brain tumors. This review examines the diverse strategies employed to enhance brain targeting, including nanotechnology, viral vectors, and biological therapies. Nanoparticles, liposomes, and dendrimers offer promising approaches for encapsulating drugs and facilitating their transport across the BBB. Viral vectors, such as adeno-associated viruses, demonstrate high transfection efficiency for gene therapy applications in CNS diseases. Biological therapies, including stem cell transplantation and neuromodulation techniques, can potentially restore normal cellular function and treat genetic disorders. Challenges such as BBB permeability, safety concerns, and regulatory considerations are discussed, along with future perspectives on precision medicine, noninvasive delivery methods, and biomarker discovery. By addressing these challenges and embracing innovative approaches, the field of brain drug targeting aims to transfer the way that neurological illness is treated and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

biological therapiesblood-brain barrier (bbb)nanotechnologyneurological disordersviral vectors

Identifiers

PMID39360065
PMCPMC11446487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.