ArticleCureus2024
Tape Stripping Method in Dermatological and Pharmacological Research: Evaluating Fresh and Frozen-Thawed Porcine Skin.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The trauma of the tundra tongue: an experimental and computational study of lingual tissue damage following adhesion to a cold metal lamp post.Head & face medicine · 2026Article
- Neomycin sulfate and triamcinolone acetonide suspended ointment designed for transdermal delivery: formulation and in vitro evaluation.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The stratum corneum (SC) plays a crucial role in protecting the skin and regulating water loss. Tape stripping is a well-established method for studying skin barrier function and evaluating topical treatments. However, the behavior of fresh versus frozen-thawed skin during tape stripping has not been extensively compared. Objective This study aims to compare the removal of the stratum corneum from fresh and frozen-thawed porcine skin using tape stripping. It also aims to assess the reliability of tape weighing versus histological methods in quantifying SC removal. Methods Fresh and frozen-thawed porcine ears were obtained, cleaned, and subjected to tape stripping at varying numbers of strips from zero to 40. Tape weight and histological measurements were used to quantify SC removal. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare SC thickness and tape weight between the two types of skin. Results The study found that frozen-thawed skin exhibited a non-linear rate (r = 0.65) of SC removal per tape strip in the first five strips compared to a linear removal for fresh skin (r = 0.96). By the fifth tape strip, frozen-thawed samples had lost 80.6% of their SC, while fresh samples had only lost 33.5% (P < 0.03). Tape weighing and histological measurements showed strong correlations (r = 0.93 for fresh skin and r = 0.95 for frozen-thawed skin), indicating that tape weighing is a reliable alternative to histology for assessing SC removal on both sample types. Conclusions Fresh and frozen-thawed porcine skin respond differently to tape stripping, with frozen-thawed skin showing accelerated SC removal in the first five strips. The strong correlation between tape weighing and histological analysis supports the use of tape weighing as a practical tool for evaluating SC removal. These findings have implications for specimen selection and methodological standardization in dermatological and pharmacological research. Future research should explore alternative preservation and SC thickness measurement methods and their impact on tape stripping outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.