ReviewCureus2024
The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Cardiovascular Imaging and Diagnosis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Machine learning for myocarditis diagnosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a systematic review, diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis, and comparison with human physicians.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning based insights into cardiomyopathy and heart failure research: a bibliometric analysis from 2005 to 2024.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Region guided mask R-CNN with Haralick ResNet fusion for accurate coronary artery disease detection in computed tomography angiography images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in African Cardiovascular Care: Opportunities, Challenges, and Pathways to Improved Outcomes.Public health challenges · 2026Review
- AI-driven multimodal imaging: unveiling hidden cardiac vulnerabilities in osteogenesis imperfecta.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Mission imputable: Effects of missing data processing on infectious disease detection and prognosis.PloS one · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in thyroid ultrasound: clinical applications and perspectives.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- The Narrative Review: Advancements in Heart Failure Diagnosis and Management using Artificial Intelligence: A New Era of Patient Care.Current cardiology reviews · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Methods for Pulmonary Congestion and Pleural Effusion: A Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Clinical Decision-Making: A Perspective on Advancing Personalized Precision Medicine for Elderly Diabetes Patients.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- A comparative study of GPT-4o and human ophthalmologists in glaucoma diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2024Observational
- Focused review on artificial intelligence for disease detection in infants.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of global mortality, underscoring the critical need for accurate and timely diagnosis. This narrative review examines the current applications and future potential of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in cardiovascular imaging. We discuss the integration of these technologies across various imaging modalities, including echocardiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and nuclear imaging techniques. The review explores AI-assisted diagnosis in key areas such as coronary artery disease detection, valve disorders assessment, cardiomyopathy classification, arrhythmia detection, and prediction of cardiovascular events. AI demonstrates promise in improving diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, and personalized care. However, significant challenges persist, including data quality standardization, model interpretability, regulatory considerations, and clinical workflow integration. We also address the limitations of current AI applications and the ethical implications of their implementation in clinical practice. Future directions point towards advanced AI architectures, multimodal imaging integration, and applications in precision medicine and population health management. The review emphasizes the need for ongoing collaboration between clinicians, data scientists, and policymakers to realize the full potential of AI in cardiovascular imaging while ensuring ethical and equitable implementation. As the field continues to evolve, addressing these challenges will be crucial for the successful integration of AI technologies into cardiovascular care, potentially revolutionizing diagnostic capabilities and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.