ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2024
Causal Effects of Gut Microbiota and Metabolites on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Bidirectional Two Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Plasma Metabolites in Mediating the Effect of Gut Microbiota on Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Two-Step, Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.Nature and science of sleep · 2025Article
- The Impact of Gut Microbiota on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Dual-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recent evidence suggests that the gut microbiome and metabolites are intricately involved in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) pathogenesis, yet the precise causal relationships remain unclear due to confounding factors and reverse causation. This study employs bidirectional two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) to clarify these connections. Methods: Summary data from publicly available Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) concerning the gut microbiome, metabolites, and COPD were compiled. The selection of genetic instrumental variables (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms, or SNPs) for MR analysis was conducted meticulously, primarily utilizing the Inverse Variance Weighting (IVW) method, supplemented by MR-Egger regression and the Weighted Median (WM) approach. The evaluation of heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy was performed using Cochran's Q test, the MR-Egger intercept test, and the MR-PRESSO global test. Sensitivity analyses, including leave-one-out tests, were conducted to verify the robustness of our results. And the mediation effect of gut microbiota-mediated changes in metabolites on the causal relationship with COPD was analyzed. Results: Our study identified nine significant gut microbiota taxa and thirteen known metabolites implicated in COPD pathogenesis. Moreover, associations between the onset of COPD and the abundance of five bacterial taxa, as well as the concentration of three known metabolites, were established. These findings consistently withstood sensitivity analyses, reinforcing their credibility. Additionally, our results revealed that gut microbiota contribute to the development of COPD by mediating changes in metabolites. Conclusion: Our bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization analysis has revealed reciprocal causal relationships between the abundance of gut microbiota and metabolite concentrations in the context of COPD. This research holds promise for identifying biomarkers for early COPD diagnosis and monitoring disease progression, thereby opening new pathways for prevention and treatment. Further investigation into the underlying mechanisms is essential to improve our understanding of COPD onset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.