Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39360004›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedic translation2024

Advanced therapy with mesenchymal stromal cells for knee osteoarthritis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Caio Gomes Tabet, Rafael Leite Pacheco, Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco, Rachel Riera, Arnaldo José Hernandez, Daniela Franco Bueno, Tiago Lazzaretti Fernandes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Chondrocyte autophagy mechanism and therapeutic prospects in osteoarthritis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caio Gomes TabetSports Medicine Division, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina do Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Rafael Leite PachecoCentre of Health Technology Assessment, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Luiza Cabrera MartimbiancoCentre of Health Technology Assessment, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rachel RieraCentre of Health Technology Assessment, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Arnaldo José HernandezSports Medicine Division, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina do Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniela Franco BuenoHospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tiago Lazzaretti FernandesSports Medicine Division, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina do Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Advanced cell therapies emerged as promising candidates for treatment of knee articular diseases, but robust evidence regarding their clinical applicability is still lacking. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of advanced mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) therapy for knee osteoarthritis (OA) and chondral lesions. Methods: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials conducted in accordance with Cochrane Handbook and reported following PRISMA checklist. GRADE approach was used for assessing the evidence certainty. Results: 25 randomized controlled trials that enrolled 1048 participants were included. Meta-analyses data showed that, compared to viscosupplementation (VS), advanced MSC therapy resulted in a 1.91 lower pain VAS score (95 % CI -3.23 to -0.59; p < 0.00001) for the treatment of knee OA after 12 months. Compared to placebo, the difference was 0.99 lower pain VAS points (95 % CI -1.94 to -0.03; p = 0.76). According to the GRADE approach, the evidence was very uncertain for both comparisons. By excluding studies with high risk of bias, there was a similar size of effect (VAS MD -1.54, 95 % CI -2.09 to -0.98; p = 0.70) with improved (moderate) certainty of evidence, suggesting that MSC therapy probably reduces pain slightly better than VS. Regarding serious adverse events, there was no difference from advanced MSC therapy to placebo or to VS, with very uncertain evidence. Conclusion: Advanced MSC therapy resulted in lower pain compared to placebo or VS for the treatment of knee OA after 12 months, with no difference in adverse events. However, the evidence was considered uncertain. The Translational Potential of this Article: Currently, there is a lack of studies with good methodological structure aiming to evaluate the real clinical impact of advanced cell therapy for knee OA. The present study was well structured and conducted, with Risk of Bias, GRADE certainty assessment and sensitivity analysis. It explores the translational aspect of the benefits and safety of MSC compared with placebo and gold-standard therapy to give practitioners and researchers support to expand this therapy in their practice. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020158173. Access at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=158173.

Indexed as

Articular CartilageCell and tissue-based therapyKnee OsteoarthritisMesenchymal stem cellRegenerative medicineStem cells

Identifiers

PMID39360004
PMCPMC11445595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.