ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2024
Barriers and Facilitators of Using Standardized Outcome Measures in Stroke Rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study of Practice Among Neurophysiotherapists.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical guidelines emphasize the use of standardized outcome measures (SOMs) in post-stroke rehabilitation. However, the extent of SOM utilization among physiotherapists in this context in Saudi Arabia remains unclear. Aim: 1) assess the current use of SOMs by physiotherapists involved in stroke rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia and 2) identify facilitators and barriers influencing the use of SOMs. Methods: An online survey was administered using a three-section questionnaire designed for this study. The first section collected demographic data, the second evaluated the use of SOMs recommended by the American Physical Therapy Association, and the third explored factors facilitating or hindering SOM use in clinical practice. Only highly recommended outcome measures capturing the three levels of the International Classification of Functioning, and Disability (ICF) model were considered: body structure and function, activities, and participation. Poisson regression analysis was used to investigate the association between SOMs utilization and educational level, work experience, type of work facility, and the number of patients treated per week. Results: A total of 138 physiotherapists responded. Most participants (98.5%) used at least one outcome measure in clinical practice. Regression analysis showed that number of strokes treated per week and facility type were associated with the likelihood of using higher number of SOMs. Physiotherapists managing more than 10 stroke patients per week and working in private sector had significantly higher odds of using a greater number of SOMs. The most pronounced barriers were time restrictions and limited resources. Conclusion: Physiotherapists working with stroke patients in Saudi Arabia demonstrate a high awareness and positive attitude toward SOM utilization. Addressing barriers such as time management and resource allocation is crucial to enhancing SOM integration in clinical practice. Clinical Rehabilitation Impact: Organizational support in terms of adequate time and resources is needed to enhance the use of SOMs among physiotherapists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.