Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39359888›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Education2024

Curriculum Innovation: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of an Interdisciplinary Teamwork-Focused Neurocritical Care In Situ Simulation Training Program.

Bethany C Young, Mikel S Ehntholt, Monisha A Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bethany C YoungFrom the Department of Nursing (B.C.Y.), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Critical Care Medicine (M.S.E.), Virtua Health, Camden, NJ; and Department of Neurology (M.S.E., M.A.K.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2022-5779
Mikel S EhntholtFrom the Department of Nursing (B.C.Y.), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Critical Care Medicine (M.S.E.), Virtua Health, Camden, NJ; and Department of Neurology (M.S.E., M.A.K.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5184-9563
Monisha A KumarFrom the Department of Nursing (B.C.Y.), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Critical Care Medicine (M.S.E.), Virtua Health, Camden, NJ; and Department of Neurology (M.S.E., M.A.K.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and Problem Statement: Neurocritical care (NCC) is a niche clinical subspecialty dependent on interdisciplinary cohesion to operate in critical situations. Team cohesion in an intensive care unit (ICU) depends not only on technical skills or medical knowledge but also on nontechnical skills such as teamwork, communication, and leadership. Developing and practicing these skills as an interdisciplinary team is not standard in most professional training programs. Objectives: This project aimed to (1) design and implement a NCC in situ simulation program aimed at practicing teamwork, (2) demonstrate feasibility and acceptability of recurring in situ simulations, and (3) assess baseline teamwork scores and clinician preparedness to respond to a clinical emergency. Methods and Curriculum Description: The NLN Jeffries Simulation Theory was used to guide the simulation program design. A 1-year pilot project consisted of monthly NCC in situ simulations. Debriefing with Good Judgment was used to guide postsimulation reflection. Feasibility was evaluated by participation metrics and simulation schedule adherence. Acceptability was assessed through postsimulation evaluations. Teamwork and preparedness were measured using the Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale (MHPTS) and 10-point Likert scale, respectively. Statistical comparison of MHPTS scores between disciplines and preparedness before vs after simulation was conducted. Results and Assessment Data: In 1 year, we conducted 12 in situ simulations, with 167 simulation learner encounters, representing 95 unique learners and 72% of our core NCC team (i.e., nurses, advanced practice providers [APPs], fellows, faculty). Analysis of program evaluations (84% survey completion rate) showed that 91% of all learners strongly agreed that the simulation provided an experiential, collaborative, trusting, and learner-centered environment. Overall, MHPTS scores were similar between disciplines, although in pairwise comparison, pharmacists rated teamwork significantly lower than both nurses ( Discussion and Lessons Learned: In situ simulation training is a feasible and acceptable method to introduce teamwork training into ICU culture. Team-based simulation improves self-reported preparation to respond to clinical emergencies. Simulation training that takes place in the clinical setting provides a powerful tool for enhancing teaching and addressing patient care gaps.

Identifiers

PMID39359888
PMCPMC11441750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.