Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39359835›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024

Classic ear moulding technique for a lop ear deformity: case report.

Wissal Touzri, Mohamed El Arbi Tahiri Alaoui, Oussama Bentahar

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wissal TouzriDepartment of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University Mohammed V.
Mohamed El Arbi Tahiri AlaouiDepartment of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University Mohammed V.
Oussama BentaharDepartment of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University Mohammed V.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and importance: Lop ear is a congenital auricular deformity (CAD) detected at birth. It can negatively impact aesthetic appearance and the mental health of both the parents and the infant. Therefore, a treatment initiated at an early age is imperative. Case presentation: A male newborn patient on his 11th week of his life presented with his mother to the Maxillofacial Prosthodontic Unit. The extraoral examination showed a pendulous upper part of the auricle covering the antihelix with no deficiencies. The newborn's hearing function was normal and no associated syndrome was identified. The patient was diagnosed with congenital unilateral lop ear (Tanzer grade II constricted ear). A non-surgical correction with a classic ear moulding device was attempted at the 11th week after birth to reshape the abnormal ear. Clinical discussion: CADs are traditionally managed by an otoplasty at age 6. Unfortunately, this option can cause many unpredictable complications, such as anaesthesia risks and under-correction. Therefore, the classic non-surgical correction of congenital auricular deformities is a non-surgical and earlier alternative to otoplasty. Moreover, many patients present at an older age; an auricular moulding device can still be a successful treatment option for these older patients. Conclusion: Classic ear moulding is an early non-surgical alternative to otoplasty for managing congenital ear abnormalities. It can be initiated as early as 6 weeks after birth. Including an ear examination as a routine in every child's immediate post-birth physical examination is crucial for early diagnosis and better outcomes.

Indexed as

case reportcongenital auricular deformitiesear mouldinglop earnon-surgical

Identifiers

PMID39359835
PMCPMC11444547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.