ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Rare clinical presentation of a ruptured spinal bulbomedullary arteriovenous malformation: a case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Spinal arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are a rare condition that has a high risk of bleeding and complications. The authors present the case of a spinal arteriovenous malformation in an unusual location and presentation. Case presentation: A 67-year-old man with subarachnoid hemorrhage due to a ruptured spinal arteriovenous malformation type IVa, with associated bulbomedullary aneurysm, which was managed conservatively due to the high risk of complications and mortality. Clinical discussion: Spinal AVMs have had different management and treatments over the years, so conservative management remains an option when arterial cannulation is complex and surgery carries a high risk of complications. Conclusion: Due to the high risk of complications of surgery in this location, conservative treatment is an option for the management of such cases with good outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.