Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39359805›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024

Exploring the need for surgical face masks in operating room: a comprehensive literature review.

Mortada Abbass, Jana Kotaich, Karl Ziade, Yara Sleiman, Hanine Olleik, Inaam Nasrallah, M Baker Obeid, Mohamad Moussa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mortada AbbassMEDICA Research Investigation.
Jana KotaichMEDICA Research Investigation.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7740-392X
Karl ZiadeMEDICA Research Investigation.
Yara SleimanMEDICA Research Investigation.
Hanine OlleikMEDICA Research Investigation.
Inaam NasrallahFaculty of Pharmacy, Lebanese University, Rafic Hariri University Campus.
M Baker ObeidFaculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Rafic Hariri University Campus.
Mohamad MoussaFaculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Rafic Hariri University Campus.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical face masks (SFM) are pivotal in preventing surgical site infections (SSI) in the operating room (OR). However, there are currently no specific recommendations for their most effective use. SFM effectiveness is influenced by factors such as material, fit, and duration of use, sparking ongoing debates about their benefits and risks in surgery. SFMs act as a protective barrier, but their ability to filter out harmful compounds is questioned. They can also impact communication and create a false sense of security. Nevertheless, SFMs aid in infection prevention and provide psychological comfort. Clear guidelines are needed to ensure their appropriate use in the OR. This paper offers a historical overview of surgical masks, emphasizing their role in infection prevention. It explores SFM effectiveness for both the surgical team and patients during surgery and considers their future in surgical settings. As we navigate the evolving landscape of SFMs, clear and concise guidelines are imperative to ensure their judicious and effective use in the OR. This paper serves as an essential resource for understanding the historical significance, contemporary efficacy, and prospective trajectory of SFMs in surgical practice.

Indexed as

medical mouth–nose protectionoperating roompersonal protective equipmentsurgical face maskssurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID39359805
PMCPMC11444544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.