ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Diagnosis and management of spontaneous coronary artery dissection: Two cases and a review of the literature.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare but potentially fatal condition, often underdiagnosed despite its significance in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The true prevalence remains uncertain due to diagnostic challenges. Identifying SCAD cases is crucial for reducing mortality and morbidity, especially considering the recurrence risk. The authors present two cases highlighting the importance of multimodality imaging in diagnosing and managing SCAD. Case presentation: Case 1: A 53-year-old man with a history of brain aneurysm presented with chest pain and shortness of breath. Despite negative EKGs and stress tests, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) revealed non-obstructive dissection flaps. Medical management improved his condition.Case 2: A 55-year-old woman with no significant medical history experienced recurrent chest pain. Initial tests were negative, but CCTA revealed SCAD. Further screening uncovered undiagnosed fibromuscular dysplasia. Clinical discussion: SCAD poses diagnostic challenges, often mimicking other cardiac conditions. Traditional tests may yield negative results, necessitating advanced imaging techniques like CCTA. Recognizing SCAD's association with connective tissue disorders (CTD) is vital for comprehensive patient care. The authors' cases emphasize the importance of a systematic approach to diagnosing chest pain, including noninvasive modalities and considering underlying etiologies. Conclusion: SCAD diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion, especially when traditional cardiac tests are inconclusive. Beyond treatment, patients should undergo further evaluation for CTDs, particularly in those with minimal risk factors for atherosclerosis. Increased awareness and a multimodal diagnostic approach are crucial for timely intervention and improved outcomes in SCAD patients. Learning objectives: The authors aim to increase awareness regarding different clinical presentations of SCAD to decrease the risk of missed or late diagnosis. The authors' case series also signifies the multimodal imaging approach's role in evaluating chest pain. Upon diagnosis of SCAD, it is imperative to go beyond treatment and implement a reverse algorithmic strategy to discover any underlying causes and risk factors for SCAD predisposition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.