ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy among peripheral pulmonary lesions: a multicenter observational study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Minimally Invasive Sampling Techniques for Pancreatic and Pulmonary Nodules: A Review of the Evolution of Guidance and Sampling Methods.Diagnostic cytopathology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPL) poses a significant challenge, prompting the widespread utilization of various modalities to ensure the precision in diagnosis. This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (CT-PTNB) in the context of pulmonary malignancy. Methods and materials: This multicenter retrospective observational study, included 1317 cases of CT-PTNB performed on adult patients with PPLs from January 2018 to December 2022 in Mashhad, Iran. The pathology results of CT-PTNB from 94 cases were compared to the definitive pathology results obtained through methods such as surgery to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of CT-PTNB in diagnosing of pulmonary malignancy. Results: CT-PTNB exhibits an accuracy of 82.98%, with sensitivity and specificity rates of 75.41 and 91.43%, respectively. This study underscores the issue of false-negative results in CT-PTNB and underscores the importance of integrating clinical, radiological, and additional diagnostic modality to guide diagnostic decisions. Conclusion: In this large-scale multicenter study, the accuracy of CT-PTNB for diagnosis of pulmonary malignancy is acceptable but fairly low compared to previous studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.