Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39359652›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Education2024

Curriculum Innovations: Enhancing Skills in Serious Illness Communication in Neurology Residents Using Simulation: A Pilot Study.

Marcey Osgood, Brian Silver, Jennifer Reidy, Vandana Nagpal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Writing: The Art of Slowing Down Thinking.Neurology. Education · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marcey OsgoodFrom the Department of Neurology (M.O.), Lahey Health and Medical Center, Burlington, MA; and Department of Neurology (B.S.), and Department of Palliative Care (J.R.,V.N.), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0241-5672
Brian SilverFrom the Department of Neurology (M.O.), Lahey Health and Medical Center, Burlington, MA; and Department of Neurology (B.S.), and Department of Palliative Care (J.R.,V.N.), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1562-9894
Jennifer ReidyFrom the Department of Neurology (M.O.), Lahey Health and Medical Center, Burlington, MA; and Department of Neurology (B.S.), and Department of Palliative Care (J.R.,V.N.), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester.
Vandana NagpalFrom the Department of Neurology (M.O.), Lahey Health and Medical Center, Burlington, MA; and Department of Neurology (B.S.), and Department of Palliative Care (J.R.,V.N.), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5752-2411

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Problem Statement: Patients with acute ischemic stroke are faced with prognostic uncertainty, progressive decline, and early mortality. Many neurologists report a lack of education and experience in providing palliative care. We developed a simulation-based curriculum to improve residents' confidence and comfort with conducting late-stage goals of care (GOC) conversations. Objectives: To assess and improve neurology residents' self-reported confidence and comfort around GOC discussions, prognostication, and hospice; encourage neurology residents to conduct GOC conversations early in the illness; introduce neurology residents to a structured framework for conducting GOC conversations; facilitate the residents to build rapport and convey a mindful presence during GOC conversations; provide direct, real-time feedback and an opportunity for redo and practice; and identify gaps for education. Methods and Curriculum Description: The 3-hour experience included a didactic session followed by an interactive simulation and debriefing. The residents' objectives were to deliver difficult news, discuss prognosis, explore goals, navigate treatment options, and discuss end-of-life care including hospice. The faculty observed each interaction and called time-outs to allow the residents to self-assess and obtain feedback. Residents and faculty debriefed to identify take-home points and to reflect on their emotions, self-care, and sense of purpose in medicine. Results and Assessment: Twenty-six neurology residents filled out an anonymous presurvey to self-assess their confidence and comfort surrounding GOC conversations. More than 50% of residents reported being confident in conducting GOC discussions, whereas only 42% reported adequate prior training. Postsession, more than 90% of residents reported that training was relevant, helpful, organized, and clear. Faculty identified that residents had difficulty addressing prognosis, assessing goals, planning treatment, and using silence, responding to emotion, and displaying empathy. Fifteen residents filled out a postsurvey that revealed improved comfort with delivering prognosis, discussing hospice, and initiating early GOC discussions. Discussion and Lessons Learned: Our project uniquely focuses on late-stage GOC conversations and builds on existing literature that supports a structured program with both didactic and simulation components to improve residents' abilities to effectively navigate GOC conversations with patients and families. Future work will focus on reinforcement and reassessment of communication skills.

Identifiers

PMID39359652
PMCPMC11419305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.