Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2024
Spark Plasma Sintering of Complex Metal and Ceramic Structures Produced by Material Extrusion.
Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alternative approaches to laser fusion for the additive manufacturing (AM) of metals are often hampered by the need for long sintering cycles. Typical sintering cycles require heating at temperatures above 80% of the melting point for several hours. The process is time- and energy-consuming, particularly when high-melting materials are involved. Applying pressure can drastically reduce the time and temperature required for densification. Recently, a particular kind of pressure-assisted sintering process known as spark plasma sintering (SPS) or field-assisted sintering (FAST) received considerable attention in academia and industry due to its ability to enhance densification. However, conventional SPS/FAST techniques cannot be directly applied to the densification of objects presenting a complex geometry. This work shows how a modified SPS/FAST setup, operating in a pseudoisostatic mode, can be used for debinding and sinter objects produced by material extrusion. This approach can be applied to metals and metal-based and ceramic-based composites when their geometry does not include closed cavities. Depending on the characteristics of the pressure-transfer medium, some level of anisotropy in the volume reduction associated with the densification can be observed. Still, it can easily be corrected by appropriately compensating sintering deformation during printing. Using this approach, the time required for the debinding and sintering can be reduced considerably. It represents an alternative approach to the AM of a wide range of inorganic materials characterized by a relatively low-cost, high material flexibility, and low environmental impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.