ArticleCaspian journal of internal medicine2024
TIMI frame count as a predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events during the first month after primary PCI.
Article in Caspian journal of internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study evaluated the correlation between corrected Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count (CTFC) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within the first month following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods: Eighty patients who underwent PPCI at Ayatollah Rouhani teaching Hospital in Babol Eighty patients who underwent PPCI at Ayatollah Rouhani teaching Hospital in Babol were included. CTFC, a measure of coronary blood flow, was assessed. Demographic and clinical data, were collected. ST segment resolution, a criterion for successful PPCI, was evaluated. MACE, including cardiac deaths, need for repeat revascularization of culprit vessels, and recurrent non-fatal myocardial infarction, and CVA (cerebrovascular accident) were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the association between CTFC and demographic/clinical variables, as well as ST resolution and MACE. Results: The majority of patients were (78.8%) men and (81.2%) nonsmokers. No significant association was found between CTFC and demographic/clinical variables. The left anterior descending (LAD) artery was the most commonly involved vessel (48.8%). ST segment resolution of more than 50% was observed in 51.2% of patients. During the one-month follow-up, 13.7% of patients experienced MACE, including 7 cardiac deaths. However, there was no significant association between CTFC and MACE. (P=0.30). Conclusion: This study concludes that CTFC is not a reliable predictor of MACE within the first month after PPCI. Furthermore, ST segment resolution of more than 50% was associated with a lower prevalence of cardiovascular events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.