ReviewCaspian journal of internal medicine2024
Effects of robotic rehabilitation on fatigue experience, disability, and quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS): A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Caspian journal of internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the orthotic effect of a passive gravity-compensated exoskeletal device on upper-limb function in people with multiple sclerosis: a pilot cross-sectional study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Robotic Rehabilitation for Gait Imbalance in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS): a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Maedica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rehabilitation plays an important role in improving symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). There are studies evaluating the effects of robotic rehabilitation in patients with MS, but the results varied between the studies. So, we designed this systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate pooled effects of robotic rehabilitation on fatigue, disability, and quality of life in subjects with MS. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and also gray literature including references of the included studies, and also conference abstracts on October 1 Results: The first literature search revealed 6878 results, after deleting duplicates, 5019 studies remained. Two researchers, evaluated the titles and abstracts, and finally 77 full texts were assessed. For meta-analysis, we included 11 studies. The pooled Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) of Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (after-before) estimated as -0.56 (95%CI: -0.89,-0.23). The pooled SMD of Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) estimated as -0.54(95%CI: -1.06, -0.01) (I Conclusions: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that robotic rehabilitation has positive effects on fatigue, and disability in patients with MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.