ReviewCaspian journal of internal medicine2024
Diagnostic value of Midkine and AFP in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Caspian journal of internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of circulating long noncoding RNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- From Gene to Enzyme: Multidimensional Decoding of the GGT Molecular Family and Its Clinical Tumor Diagnosis.Cancer medicine · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) posed significant health problems and deaths. There are various challenges in the management of HCC, including the late detection or diagnosis. The ongoing diagnostic method in HCC also hinders the detection on the early stages of the disease, thus biomarkers need to be explored further for HCC detection. Serum alpha fetoprotein (AFP) and Midkine (MDK) are two proteins which might be the biomarker of choice in the detection of HCC. This meta-analysis aims to analyze the accuracy of Midkine and AFP in the detection of HCC. Methods: The systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by adhering to the Preferred Reporting System for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We conduct literature screening and selection followed by quality assessment from various databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, SpringerLink, ProQuest, EBSCOhost, Cochrane, and EMBASE. The included studies were then extracted and analyzed cumulatively using MedCalc and MetaDTA with forest plot and ROC curve as outcome. Results: 12 studies were included in this study. The AFP biomarker yields sensitivity value of 62.5% (97.5% CI 0.442 - 0.778) and specificity value of 95% (97.5% CI 0.842 - 0.986), while the Midkine biomarker denotes sensitivity value of 91.6% (97.5% CI 0.83 - 0.961) and specificity value of 82.2% (97.5% CI 0.83 - 0.96). Conclusions: Both AFP and MDK are proven to be a good diagnostic tool or biomarker in the detection of HCC. The use of both in combination should provide high quality diagnostic marker for HCC suspected patients. Further studies on this should be conducted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.