ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Survival benefits of radiotherapy in locally advanced unresectable and metastatic pancreatic cancer: a single-institution cohort and SEER database analysis.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The evolving role of radiotherapy in oligometastatic pancreatic cancer: from palliation to disease-modifying multidisciplinary integration.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Impact of lymph node dissection on overall survival and cancer-specific survival in elderly patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a SEER database analysis.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chemotherapy (CT) remains the primary treatment for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAUPC) and metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). The role of radiotherapy (RT) in these conditions remains unclear. This study compares the outcomes of CT alone versus CT combined with RT (combined-modality therapy [CMT]) in LAUPC and MPC patients. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of LAUPC and MPC patients treated with either CT or CMT from a single institution and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox hazards models evaluated the association between treatment modalities and overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching (PSM) ensured balanced comparisons. Landmark analysis addressed immortal time bias. Subgroup analyses were based on clinical characteristics. eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) assessed outcome prediction and influence of significant predictors. Results: The study included 102 patients receiving CMT and 155 receiving CT at single institution, along with 1733 CMT and 9310 CT patients from the SEER dataset. In the single-institution cohort, CMT showed superior survival compared to CT both before (median OS: 20.5 vs. 11.5 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.34-0.65, P=0.001) and after PSM (median OS: 22.2 vs. 11.8 months, HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.30-0.79, P=0.003). Multivariate analyses confirmed that CMT was independently associated with improved OS both before (HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.38-0.77, P=0.001) and after PSM (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.27-0.73, P=0.001). Landmark analysis indicated better OS for patients receiving CMT compared to CT alone. Subgroup analysis revealed an OS benefit for CMT across most subgroups. SHAP value analysis indicated that CMT was the most significant contributor to survival outcomes. SEER database validation confirmed these findings. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that CMT significantly improves OS in LAUPC and MPC patients compared to CT alone. Integrating RT with CT could be beneficial for treating LAUPC and MPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.