ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Preoperative MRI-based radiomic nomogram for distinguishing solitary fibrous tumor from angiomatous meningioma: a multicenter study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal MRI-based nomogram integrating clinical-radiological, radiomic, and habitat features to discriminate solitary fibrous tumors from atypical meningiomas.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advancements in the application of MRI radiomics in meningioma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluates the efficacy of radiomics-based machine learning methodologies in differentiating solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) from angiomatous meningioma (AM). Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 171 pathologically confirmed cases (94 SFT and 77 AM) spanning from January 2009 to September 2020 across four institutions. The study comprised a training set (n=137) and a validation set (n=34). All patients underwent contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1WI) and T2-weighted(T2WI) MRI scans, from which 1166 radiomics features were extracted. Subsequently, seventeen features were selected through minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to assess the independence of these features as predictors. A clinical model, established via both univariate and multivariate logistic regression based on MRI morphological features, was integrated with the optimal radiomics model to formulate a radiomics nomogram. The performance of the models was assessed utilizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: The radiomics nomogram demonstrated exceptional discriminative performance in the validation set, achieving an AUC of 0.989. This outperformance was evident when compared to both the radiomics algorithm (AUC= 0.968) and the clinical model (AUC = 0.911) in the same validation sets. Notably, the radiomics nomogram exhibited impressive values for ACC, SEN, and SPE at 97.1%, 93.3%, and 100%, respectively, in the validation set. Conclusions: The machine learning-based radiomic nomogram proves to be highly effective in distinguishing between SFT and AM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.