ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2024
A case report of critical aortic stenosis diagnosed utilizing non-imaging continuous wave Doppler probe.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case series: the right parasternal view and its prognostic value in detecting pathological abnormalities on transthoracic echocardiography.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most commonly acquired valvular pathology in the western world. Aortic stenosis severity is typically evaluated with Doppler echocardiography. Evaluation of aortic gradients using standard Doppler echocardiography from the apical window may underestimate the true gradient due to misalignment of blood flow to the ultrasound beam and is often better evaluated from other imaging windows using a non-imaging continuous wave Doppler (NI-CWD) probe. Herein, we describe a unique case of AS being underestimated by dynamic acoustic shadowing from the apical window rather than beam misalignment. Case summary: The patient is a Hispanic 31-year-old male with a congenital bicuspid aortic valve who underwent a balloon aortic valvuloplasty at age 13. At age 31, the patient underwent a repeat transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) that was largely unchanged from his prior TTE from 15 years prior. Notably on this TTE, there was acoustic shadowing of colour Doppler in the distal left ventricular outflow tract and aortic valve during systole. While gradients only suggested moderate AS, the degree of left ventricular hypertrophy was suspicious for more severe AS. Only by using the NI-CWD probe at the right sternal border were we able to identify very severe AS with a peak velocity of 6.5 m/s and a mean gradient of 100 mmHg. Discussion: In our specific case, dynamic acoustic shadowing of the aortic valve from the apical window obscured both imaging and Doppler signals. This acoustic shadowing was not present from the right sternal border with the NI-CWD probe, leading to an over 100% increase in aortic valve peak velocity and proper correction of AS severity. This allowed for expedited care and underscores the importance of such techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.