Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39359335›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2024

A practical post-Hartree-Fock approach describing open-shell metal cluster-support interactions. Application to Cu

Katarzyna M Krupka, Agnieszka Krzemińska, María Pilar de Lara-Castells

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katarzyna M KrupkaInstitute of Fundamental Physics (AbinitSim Unit ABINITFOT Group), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) Madrid Spain Pilar.deLara.Castells@csic.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6248-6710
Agnieszka KrzemińskaInstitute of Physics, Lodz University of Technology ul. Wolczanska 219 90-924 Lodz Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3250-4193
María Pilar de Lara-CastellsInstitute of Fundamental Physics (AbinitSim Unit ABINITFOT Group), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) Madrid Spain Pilar.deLara.Castells@csic.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8697-5770

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current advances in synthesizing and characterizing atomically precise monodisperse metal clusters (AMCs) at the subnanometer scale have opened up fascinating possibilities in designing new heterogeneous (photo)catalysts as well as functional interfaces between AMCs and biologically relevant molecules. Understanding the nature of AMC-support interactions at molecular-level is essential for optimizing (photo)catalysts performance and designing novel ones with improved properties. Møller-Plesset second-order perturbation theory (MP2) is one of the most cost-efficient single-reference post-Hartree-Fock wave-function-based theories that can be applied to AMC-support interactions considering adequate molecular models of the support, and thus complementing state-of-the-art dispersion-corrected density functional theory. However, the resulting AMC-support interaction is typically overestimated with the MP2 method and must be corrected. The coupled MP2 (MP2C) scheme replacing the uncoupled Hartree-Fock dispersion energy by a coupled dispersion contribution, has been proven to describe accurately van-der-Waals (vdW)-dominated interactions between closed-shell AMCs and carbon-based supports. In this work, the accuracy of a MP2C-based scheme is evaluated in modelling open-shell AMC-cluster interactions that imply charge transfer or other strong attractive energy contributions beyond vdW forces. For this purpose, we consider the interaction of Cu

Identifiers

PMID39359335
PMCPMC11446239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.