Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39359332›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

OpenAI o1-Preview vs. ChatGPT in Healthcare: A New Frontier in Medical AI Reasoning.

Mohamad-Hani Temsah, Amr Jamal, Khalid Alhasan, Abdulkarim A Temsah, Khalid H Malki

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohamad-Hani TemsahPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Pediatric Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Amr JamalFamily and Community Medicine Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Khalid AlhasanPediatric Nephrology Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdulkarim A TemsahDental Department, Specialized Medical Center Hospital, Riyadh, SAU.
Khalid H MalkiCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This editorial explores the recent advancements in generative artificial intelligence with the newly-released OpenAI o1-Preview, comparing its capabilities to the traditional ChatGPT (GPT-4) model, particularly in the context of healthcare. While ChatGPT has shown many applications for general medical advice and patient interactions, OpenAI o1-Preview introduces new features with advanced reasoning skills using a

Indexed as

ai ethicsartificial intelligencechain of thoughtchatgptcomplex reasoninggenetic disease discoveryhallucinationshealthcare applicationsopenai o1-previewtransparency in ai and llms black box

Identifiers

PMID39359332
PMCPMC11444422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.