ArticleCase reports in immunology2024
Allergic Contact Dermatitis Reaction to Permanent Tattoo Containing Paraphenylenediamine: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paraphenylenediamine (PPD) is a well-known culprit allergen in the literature and clinical practice. Although this has been described in temporary tattoos, the definite implication of PPD in permanent tattoos has not been described. We report a patient who developed severe allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) requiring skin grafting after receiving a permanent tattoo with ink containing PPD. A 30-year-old female with a past history of atopic dermatitis and psoriasis presented with a 2-week history of cutaneous reaction to a recent tattoo. The patient noticed inflammation and irritation of the tattoo site the day after administration. The patient was previously identified on patch testing to have a PPD allergy after evaluation for dermatitis after hair dye application. Following the tattoo placement, she applied soap and bacitracin cream which she had used several years prior on a similar tattoo. On presentation 2 weeks later, she was found to have a deep ulcerated plaque with an indurated border encompassing the area of the tattoo. She was referred to the emergency department and admitted for treatment, ultimately requiring debridement and skin grafting. The patient obtained the safety data sheets for the tattoo inks which revealed PPD as an ingredient in every color. We believe this is the first confirmed case of PPD being implicated as the causative agent for ACD to a permanent tattoo. Tattoo ink is unregulated, and formulas are proprietary which makes safe practice difficult for patients with sensitivities. We advocate for consistent ingredient labeling, regulation, and transparency within the tattoo ink industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.