Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39359315›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Education2023

Education Research: Virtual Patient Management Conference for Epilepsy Surgery in the Post-COVID-19 Era: An Educational Perspective.

Thomas Pecha, Sharonya Shetty, Abhishek Kengen, Jay Gavvala, Atul Maheshwari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Seminars in epileptology: Presurgical epilepsy evaluation.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2025
    Review
  2. Missing Full Disclosures.Neurology. Education · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas PechaFrom the Baylor College of Medicine (T.P., S.S., A.K., A.M.); and McGovern Medical School (J.G.), Houston, TX.
Sharonya ShettyFrom the Baylor College of Medicine (T.P., S.S., A.K., A.M.); and McGovern Medical School (J.G.), Houston, TX.
Abhishek KengenFrom the Baylor College of Medicine (T.P., S.S., A.K., A.M.); and McGovern Medical School (J.G.), Houston, TX.
Jay GavvalaFrom the Baylor College of Medicine (T.P., S.S., A.K., A.M.); and McGovern Medical School (J.G.), Houston, TX.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9392-6608
Atul MaheshwariFrom the Baylor College of Medicine (T.P., S.S., A.K., A.M.); and McGovern Medical School (J.G.), Houston, TX.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3045-7901

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to assess the potential educational value of a virtual patient management conference (PMC) with the introduction of inclusive anonymous polling at a comprehensive epilepsy center. The secondary objective was to evaluate differences between faculty and trainee polling results. Methods: Two online surveys were sent 1 year apart seeking opinions about a transition to virtual PMC and completed by virtual PMC faculty participants (including representatives from neurology, neurosurgery, and neuropsychology). One online survey was sent to trainees (medical students, residents, and fellows) to assess the educational value of the conference. Anonymous electronic polls surveying treatment options were completed by both faculty and trainees after each virtual PMC presentation but before discussing the case. The results were collected and analyzed over 16 months, including over the course of 1 academic year. The degree of consensus was determined by the maximum percentage of votes that a single choice received. Results: Eleven faculty and 22 trainees responded to their respective surveys. The initial faculty survey revealed that 60.0% of faculty had an "excellent" or "very good" experience with virtual PMC; 1 year later, this proportion increased to 100.0% while trainees reported 90.9%. Each virtual PMC component, including perceived standard of care, was found to be "excellent" or "very good" by most faculty and trainees, and most (91% faculty, 63.7% trainees) were equally comfortable or more comfortable expressing opinions during the virtual discussion. During virtual PMC polls, faculty members were significantly more likely to vote for vagus nerve stimulation as a treatment option, while trainees were more likely to opt for responsive neurostimulation. Linear regression over the course of the academic year showed stable consensus over time for both faculty and trainees; however, the match between faculty and trainee consensus significantly increased over the academic year. Discussion: Our results demonstrate that the virtual PMC constitutes an effective educational experience as an alternative to in-person conferences for the management of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

Identifiers

PMID39359315
PMCPMC11419302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.