Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39359288›Full record

ReviewIndian dermatology online journal

Pemphigus and Pregnancy.

Dipankar De, Shikha Shah, Rahul Mahajan, Sanjeev Handa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian dermatology online journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Widespread Blistering on Day One in a Neonate.Indian dermatology online journal · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dipankar DeDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Shikha ShahDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Rahul MahajanDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sanjeev HandaDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pemphigus in pregnancy is a special clinical scenario that has potential consequences on both maternal and fetal outcomes. Being an autoimmune disease with Th2 preponderance, pemphigus is expected to flare in pregnancy, especially in the first two trimesters. Fetal outcomes like stillbirth and neonatal pemphigus have been reported, the latter being a consequence of a transient transplacental transfer of autoantibodies. Management needs to be individualized keeping the risk/benefit ratios of therapies in mind while optimizing maternal and fetal health. It is crucial to have appropriate counseling regarding conception for women with pemphigus in the child-bearing period because the probability of adverse materno-fetal outcomes is higher if the disease is severe.

Indexed as

Neonatal pemphiguspemphiguspregnancypregnancy outcome

Identifiers

PMID39359288
PMCPMC11444454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.