ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
Engineering bacterial theranostics: from logic gates to
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacteria mediated tumor therapy recent advances challenges and future perspectives.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Bacteria as living biosensors for DNA.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2026Article
- Sorafenib nanomedicine in HCC: nano-bio interactions and combination therapies.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Mucosal immunity in cancer metastasis: roles, mechanisms, and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Engineering the holobiont: Synthetic biology strategies for reversing bioenergetic collapse in radiation enteritis.AIMS microbiology · 2026Review
- Theranostic Nanoprobes for Rheumatoid Arthritis: From Inflammation Visualization to Guided Precision Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Intelligent molecular logic computing toolkits: nucleic acid-based construction, functionality, and enhanced biosensing applications.Chemical science · 2025Review
- Engineered Bacteria for Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Using Synthetic Biology.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past 2 decades, rapid advances in synthetic biology have enabled the design of increasingly intricate and biologically relevant systems with broad applications in healthcare. A growing area of interest is in designing bacteria that sense and respond to endogenous disease-associated signals, creating engineered theranostics that function as disease surveyors for human health. In particular, engineered cells hold potential in facilitating greatly enhanced temporal and spatial control over the release of a range of therapeutics. Such systems are particularly useful for targeting challenging, under-drugged disease targets in a more nuanced manner than is currently possible. This review provides an overview of the recent advances in the design, delivery, and dynamics of bacterial theranostics to enable safe, robust, and genetically tractable therapies to treat disease. It outlines the primary challenges in theranostic clinical translation, proposes strategies to overcome these issues, and explores promising future avenues for the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.