Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39359230›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2025

More knee reinjuries after ACL reconstruction compared to nonsurgical treatment of the ACL. A 2-year follow-up of the NACOX prospective cohort study.

Anna S Selin, Håkan Gauffin, Henrik Hedevik, Anne Fältström, Joanna Kvist

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna S SelinDepartment of Orthopaedics and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2159-2535
Håkan GauffinDepartment of Orthopaedics and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3565-4461
Henrik HedevikUnit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5873-614X
Anne FältströmUnit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3811-7381
Joanna KvistDepartment of Orthopaedics and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3527-5488

Funding

ALF Grants Region Östergötland LIO-934538Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden FORSS856741Swedish Medical Research Council VR2018-02563Swedish Research Council for Sport Science CIFP2022-0058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe knee reinjuries and surgeries within 2 years after an acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, in patients treated with or without ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

methodsTwo years follow-up of 275 patients (52% females, mean age 25.2 [SD 7.0] years) about knee reinjuries and surgeries were analysed from the prospective NACOX cohort study, aiming to describe recovery after an acute ACL injury treated according to clinical routine. Knee reinjury was defined as increase or new symptoms due to new trauma. At 2 years after injury, 169 (61%) had undergone an ACLR. Results are presented with descriptive statistics and risk ratios (RR).

resultsThirty-two patients sustained reinjuries within 2 years; 6 in the non-ACLR group, and 26 in the ACLR group (7 before and 19 after ACLR). Twelve patients in the ACLR group sustained a graft rupture and three did an ACL revision. Patients with non-ACLR, aged 21-25 years, had a 5.9-fold higher risk for reinjury than those aged 15-20 years (RR 5.9 [1.3-26.9]; p = 0.012). Twenty-four patients had surgery in the non-ACLR group and 36 patients in the ACLR group (excluding primary ACLR), where six were before ACLR and 30 were after ACLR.

conclusionTwelve percent sustained a knee reinjury and 21% underwent knee surgery within 2 years after the index ACL injury. There was a higher reinjury incidence in the ACLR group, but no difference in incidence of surgeries. Thus, ACLR did not reduce the risk of traumatic reinjuries or surgeries, which is important for treatment decision considerations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionKnee InjuriesReinjuriesAdolescentAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleProspective StudiesReoperationYoung Adultmeniscusnonsurgical treatmentrehabilitationreturn to sport

Identifiers

PMID39359230
PMCPMC12022819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.