Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39359167›Full record

ArticleAndrology2025

Machine learning-based classification of varicocoele grading: A promising approach for diagnosis and treatment optimization.

Mehmet Vehbi Kayra, Ali Şahin, Serdar Toksöz, Mehmet Serindere, Emre Altıntaş, Halil Özer, Murat Gül

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Andrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Recent Trends in the Management of Varicocele.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mehmet Vehbi KayraDepartment of Urology, Adana Dr. Turgut Noyan Application and Research Center, Baskent University, Adana, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7349-9952
Ali ŞahinDepartment of Emergency Service, Konya Dr. Vefa Tanır State Hospital, Konya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3139-8205
Serdar ToksözDepartment of Urology, Sincan Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2649-1157
Mehmet SerindereDepartment of Radiology, Hatay Education and Research Hospital, Hatay, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1166-2467
Emre AltıntaşDepartment of Urology, Selcuk University School of Medicine, Konya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6797-3937
Halil ÖzerDepartment of Radiology, Selcuk University School of Medicine, Konya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1141-1094
Murat GülDepartment of Urology, Selcuk University School of Medicine, Konya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6657-6227

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaricocoele is a correctable cause of male infertility. Although physical examination is still being used in diagnosis and grading, it gives conflicting results when compared to ultrasonography-based varicocoele grading.

objectivesWe aimed to develop a multi-class machine learning model for the grading of varicocoeles based on ultrasonographic measurements.

methodBetween January and May 2024, we enrolled unilateral varicocoele patients at an infertility clinic, assessing their varicocoele stages using the Dubin and Amelar system. We measured vascular diameter and reflux time at the testicular apex and the subinguinal region ultrasonography in both the supine and standing positions. Using these measurements, we developed four multi-class machine learning models, evaluating their performance metrics and determining which patient position and projection were most influential in varicocoele grading.

resultsWe included 248 patients with unilateral varicocoele in the study, their average age was 26.61 ± 4.95 years old. Of these, 212 had left-sided and 36 had right-sided varicocoeles. According to the Dubin and Amelar system, there were 66 grade I, 96 grade II, and 86 grade III varicocoeles. Among the models we created, the random forest (RF) model performed best, with an overall accuracy of 0.81 ± 0.06, an F1 score of 0.79 ± 0.02, a sensitivity of 0.69 ± 0.02, and a specificity of 0.8 ± 0.03. Vascular diameter measurement at the testicular apex in the supine position had the most impact on grading across all models. In support vector machine and multi-layer perceptron models, reflux time measurements from the subinguinal projection in the standing position contributed the most, while in RF and k-nearest neighbors models, measurements from the subinguinal projection in the supine position were the most influential.

conclusionsMachine learning methods have demonstrated superior accuracy in predicting disease compared to traditional statistical regressions and nomograms. These advancements hold promise for clinically automated prediction of varicocoele grades in patients. Tailored varicocoele grading for individuals has the potential to enhance treatment effectiveness and overall quality of life.

Indexed as

Machine LearningVaricoceleAdultHumansMaleSeverity of Illness IndexUltrasonographyYoung Adultartificial intelligenceDubin–Amelargradingmachine learningvaricocoele

Identifiers

PMID39359167
PMCPMC12368931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.