ArticleNMR in biomedicine2024
Accelerated 2D radial Look-Locker T1 mapping using a deep learning-based rapid inversion recovery sampling technique.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methods for Uncertainty Quantification in Dictionary Matching to Advance Reliability of Quantitative MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- DeepRelaxo: Fast Mono-Exponential Magnitude Brain R2* Mapping With Reduced Echoes Using Self-Supervised Deep Learning.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Efficient abdominal coverage with T1-mapping methods currently available in the clinic is limited by the breath hold period (BHP) and the time needed for T1 recovery. This work develops a T1-mapping framework for efficient abdominal coverage based on rapid T1 recovery curve (T1RC) sampling, slice-selective inversion, optimized slice interleaving, and a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based T1 estimation. The effect of reducing the T1RC sampling was evaluated by comparing T1 estimates from T1RC ranging from 0.63 to 2.0 s with reference T1 values obtained from T1RC = 2.5-5 s. Slice interleaving methodologies were evaluated by comparing the T1 variation in abdominal organs across slices. The repeatability of the proposed framework was demonstrated by performing acquisition on test subjects across imaging sessions. Analysis of in vivo data based on retrospectively shortening the T1RC showed that with the CNN framework, a T1RC = 0.84 s yielded T1 estimates without significant changes in mean T1 (p > 0.05) or significant increase in T1 variability (p > 0.48) compared to the reference. Prospectively acquired data using T1RC = 0.84 s, an optimized slice interleaving scheme, and the CNN framework enabled 21 slices in a 20 s BHP. Analyses across abdominal organs produced T1 values within 2% of the reference. Repeatability experiments yielded Pearson's correlation, repeatability coefficient, and coefficient of variation of 0.99, 2.5%, and 0.12%, respectively. The proposed T1 mapping framework provides full abdominal coverage within a single BHP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.