Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39358992›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2024

Accelerated 2D radial Look-Locker T1 mapping using a deep learning-based rapid inversion recovery sampling technique.

Eze Ahanonu, Ute Goerke, Kevin Johnson, Brian Toner, Diego R Martin, Vibhas Deshpande, Ali Bilgin, Maria Altbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eze AhanonuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Ute GoerkeSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Kevin JohnsonDepartment of Medical Imaging, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Brian TonerApplied Math Program, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Diego R MartinDepartment of Radiology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Vibhas DeshpandeSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Austin, Texas, USA.
Ali BilginDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Maria AltbachDepartment of Medical Imaging, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.

Funding

Improvement of Overall recruitment, Latino Community Outreach and MRI acquisitionR01AG070987 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI WEINKAUF, CRAIG C · 2021 to 2025
$6.5M
Multi-Center Implementation and Validation of Efficient Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Analysis of Atherosclerotic Disease of the Cervical CarotidR01HL159200 · NHLBI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ALTBACH, MARIA I., DESHPANDE, VIBHAS · 2021 to 2025
$6.1M
Quantitative MRI and Deep Learning Technologies for Classification of NAFLDU01EB031894 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Maria I. Altbach, VIBHAS DESHPANDE · 2022 to 2026
$3.0M
Advancing MRI technology for early diagnosis of liver metastasesR01CA245920 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI ALTBACH, MARIA I., MARTIN, DIEGO R · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
Arizona Biomedical Research Centre CTR056039NCI NIH HHS R01 CA245920NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL159200NIA NIH HHS R01 AG070987NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB031894NIH HHS AG070987NIH HHS CA245920NIH HHS EB031894NIH HHS HL4038940Technology and Research Initiative Fund (TRIF) Improving Health Initiative
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient abdominal coverage with T1-mapping methods currently available in the clinic is limited by the breath hold period (BHP) and the time needed for T1 recovery. This work develops a T1-mapping framework for efficient abdominal coverage based on rapid T1 recovery curve (T1RC) sampling, slice-selective inversion, optimized slice interleaving, and a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based T1 estimation. The effect of reducing the T1RC sampling was evaluated by comparing T1 estimates from T1RC ranging from 0.63 to 2.0 s with reference T1 values obtained from T1RC = 2.5-5 s. Slice interleaving methodologies were evaluated by comparing the T1 variation in abdominal organs across slices. The repeatability of the proposed framework was demonstrated by performing acquisition on test subjects across imaging sessions. Analysis of in vivo data based on retrospectively shortening the T1RC showed that with the CNN framework, a T1RC = 0.84 s yielded T1 estimates without significant changes in mean T1 (p > 0.05) or significant increase in T1 variability (p > 0.48) compared to the reference. Prospectively acquired data using T1RC = 0.84 s, an optimized slice interleaving scheme, and the CNN framework enabled 21 slices in a 20 s BHP. Analyses across abdominal organs produced T1 values within 2% of the reference. Repeatability experiments yielded Pearson's correlation, repeatability coefficient, and coefficient of variation of 0.99, 2.5%, and 0.12%, respectively. The proposed T1 mapping framework provides full abdominal coverage within a single BHP.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAbdomenAdultFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleReproducibility of Resultsabdominal imagingdeep learningLook‐Lockerradial samplingsingle‐shot inversion recoveryT1 mapping

Identifiers

PMID39358992
PMCPMC11892465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.