ArticleThe American journal of case reports2024
Rare Case of Post-Traumatic Abducens-Oculomotor Nerve Synkinesis Exhibiting Unusual Ocular Motility.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acquired synkinesis is a well-known phenomenon following oculomotor nerve injury. The abnormal movement appears within the distribution of 1 nerve, or other cranial nerves may be involved. The common misdirection of aberrant regeneration of oculomotor nerve involves the lid, extraocular muscles, or pupil. This report presents a case of aberrant connection between abducens and oculomotor nerve, which is quite rare. CASE REPORT A 21-year-old man with history of left-sided frontal, lateral orbital wall, and zygomatic fracture from head trauma in a motor vehicle accident presented for evaluation. He was comatose for 6 weeks in the intensive care unit. Six months later, he presented to the ophthalmology clinic for an eye examination. He had no history of eye problems prior to this accident. His best corrected visual acuity in the right eye was 20/20 and the left eye had no light perception. The right eye exam was normal, with normal ocular motility. The left eye exam showed small esotropia in primary position with markedly decreased adduction, elevation, and minimal depression, but on attempted abduction, the left eye would adduct instead. There was no globe retraction when left eye abduction was attempted. The abnormal movement seen resulted from third nerve function during sixth nerve stimulation, due to unusual ocular motility with abnormal connection between the sixth and third cranial nerves. CONCLUSIONS The most likely pathophysiologic mechanism here is peripheral neuronal misdirection hypothesis after trauma. Careful and detailed examination of a patient presenting with unusual ocular motility after trauma is very important. The abnormal connection between the sixth and third cranial nerves is quite rare but can occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.