ArticleJournal of cellular physiology2024
RETRACTION: Circular RNA Circ_0001946 Acts As a Competing Endogenous RNA to Inhibit Glioblastoma Progression by Modulating miR-671-5p and CDR1.
Article in Journal of cellular physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
retractionX. Li and H. Diao, "Circular RNA Circ_0001946 Acts as a Competing Endogenous RNA to Inhibit Glioblastoma Progression by Modulating miR-671-5p and CDR1," Journal of Cellular Physiology 234, no. 8 (2019): 13807-13819, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.28061. The above article, published online on 21 January 2019 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Alexander Hutchison; and Wiley Periodicals LLC. The retraction has been agreed due to several instances of overlaps within and between images in Figures 4e, 4 g, 6e and 6 g, which should represent different cell types and experimental conditions. The authors were invited to comment on the concerns raised but did not respond. The editors consider the results and conclusion reported in this article unreliable.
Identifiers
39358870What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.