ArticleESC heart failure2025
Gender-specific risks for incident cancer in patients with different heart failure phenotypes.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in cancer patients and survivors. A scientific statement of the Heart Failure Association of the ESC and the ESC Council of Cardio-Oncology.European journal of heart failure · 2025Article
- Increased risk of colorectal cancer in young males with higher cardiovascular risk: A nationwide population-based cohort study.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Gender-specific risks for incident cancer in patients with different heart failure phenotypes.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Smoking trends in Poland (2012-2021)-insights from the comprehensive cardiovascular risk prevention program.Frontiers in public health · 2025Observational
- Tumour necrosis factor-Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is conflicting evidence regarding whether heart failure (HF) increases the risk of developing cancer.
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the association between HF and incident cancer, considering gender differences and HF phenotypes.
methodsThis retrospective study was conducted on data of adult individuals, free of cancer at baseline, from the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between January 2009 and February 2023. The patients with HF were categorized as HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The primary outcome was incident cancer, including obesity-related, tobacco-related, lung, colorectal and breast cancers.
resultsOf 33 033 individuals enrolled, 16 722 were diagnosed with HF, including 10 086 (60.3%) with HFpEF and 6636 (39.7%) with HFrEF. During a median follow-up period of 4.6 years (inter-quartile range: 2.6-7.3), incident cancer was diagnosed in 10.5% (1707 patients) of the non-HF group and 15.1% (2533 individuals) of the HF group. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, patients with HF had a 58% increased risk of cancer than those without HF [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48-1.69, P < 0.001]. This risk was consistent across genders (female: adjusted HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.74-2.18, P < 0.001; male: adjusted HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.30-1.54, P < 0.001) and HF phenotypes (HFpEF: adjusted HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.57-1.81, P < 0.001; HFrEF: adjusted HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.20-1.46, P < 0.001).
conclusionsBoth HFpEF and HFrEF are associated with an increased risk of incident cancer. This correlation maintains its validity across genders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.