ReviewBioData mining2024
Deep learning-based approaches for multi-omics data integration and analysis.
Review in BioData mining, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
124 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for genomic science: a scoping review of concepts, architectures, applications, and open challenges.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Pooled it
- Multi-omics time-series analysis in microbiome research: a systematic review.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Pooled it
- Multi-omics graph attention network reveals neuro-immune-tumor pathways in breast cancer liver depression syndrome.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Trial
- Review
- Insights into Microbiota-Vaccine Crosstalk in Humans: Mechanisms, Modulators, and Translational Horizons.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Multimodality, interaction modeling, and multimodule architectures in genomic prediction: A unified conceptual framework.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Review
- Next-generation kidney tissue analysis - spatial omics and digital pathology.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
- Genome-phenome association prediction using weighted deep matrix factorization with a multisource graph attention network.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven advancements in agricultural biotechnology.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Consistency of feature attribution in deep learning architectures for multi-omics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Toward A Pre-disease State-centered New Paradigm in Multi-omics Research.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2026Article
- AI-Assisted Spatial Metabolic Engineering in Plants: Integrating Flux Design, Spatial Omics, and Synthetic Biology.Metabolites · 2026Review
- Exploring the use of machine and deep learning in genome-wide association studies: a comprehensive review.BioData mining · 2026Review
- PIMO: pathway-based interpretable multiomics interactions for multiomics integration.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics integration for plant enhancement: advances, challenges, and future perspectives.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Harnessing artificial intelligence for pediatric health: Current trends and future opportunities.iScience · 2026Review
- Article
- Application of deep learning in crop research: From genomics to phenomics.The plant genome · 2026Review
- Integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis identifies C5NT1AL as a candidate gene influencing inosine monophosphate levels in chicken breast muscle.Poultry science · 2026Article
64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe rapid growth of deep learning, as well as the vast and ever-growing amount of available data, have provided ample opportunity for advances in fusion and analysis of complex and heterogeneous data types. Different data modalities provide complementary information that can be leveraged to gain a more complete understanding of each subject. In the biomedical domain, multi-omics data includes molecular (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenomics, metabolomics, etc.) and imaging (radiomics, pathomics) modalities which, when combined, have the potential to improve performance on prediction, classification, clustering and other tasks. Deep learning encompasses a wide variety of methods, each of which have certain strengths and weaknesses for multi-omics integration.
methodIn this review, we categorize recent deep learning-based approaches by their basic architectures and discuss their unique capabilities in relation to one another. We also discuss some emerging themes advancing the field of multi-omics integration.
resultsDeep learning-based multi-omics integration methods were categorized broadly into non-generative (feedforward neural networks, graph convolutional neural networks, and autoencoders) and generative (variational methods, generative adversarial models, and a generative pretrained model). Generative methods have the advantage of being able to impose constraints on the shared representations to enforce certain properties or incorporate prior knowledge. They can also be used to generate or impute missing modalities. Recent advances achieved by these methods include the ability to handle incomplete data as well as going beyond the traditional molecular omics data types to integrate other modalities such as imaging data.
conclusionWe expect to see further growth in methods that can handle missingness, as this is a common challenge in working with complex and heterogeneous data. Additionally, methods that integrate more data types are expected to improve performance on downstream tasks by capturing a comprehensive view of each sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.