ArticleBMC medical genomics2024
Identification of a novel EYA4 likely pathogenic variant in a Chinese family with postlingual non-syndromic hearing loss and analysis of molecular epidemiology of EYA4 variants.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEYA4 variants are responsible for DFNA10 deafness. Due to its insidious onset and slow progression, hearing loss in autosomal dominant non-syndromic hearing loss (ADNSHL) is usually challenging to detect early in clinical settings, with limited intervention options. Genetic testing can aid in early detection of hearing loss, enabling timely intervention to reduce disability rates and improve the quality of life.
methodsIn this study, we report the case of a Chinese family with postlingual and progressive hearing loss that was passed down for four generations. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on DNA samples from the proband. Candidate variants identified in the proband and family members were confirmed via Sanger sequencing. In silico prediction tools and co-segregation analyses were used to assess the pathogenicity of identified variants. A literature review of known EYA4 variants was performed, analysing variant frequency, distribution characteristics across different populations, and genotype-phenotype correlations.
resultsWe identified a novel EYA4 variant, c.1745_1748del (p.Glu582ValfsTer6), in a Chinese family with ADNSHL, and co-segregation with the family's phenotype was confirmed. The audiometry showed mid-to-high frequency downsloping hearing loss. To date, 52 pathogenic variants of EYA4 have been reported, with majority identified in Asian populations. Most observed are the missense and frameshift variants.
conclusionsA novel variant of EYA4 was identified in a Chinese family with postlingual hearing loss, contributing to the expanding spectrum of EYA4 variants. The audiological features of EYA4 variants are highly heterogeneous and often challenging to detect early in clinical settings. Our findings highlight the significance of genetic testing in patients presenting with postlingual hearing loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.